Craig Saunders | Unshackled 7 | Guilty by Association. Because Most People Will Believe All The Lies

​

False Eyewitness Testimony Takes the Life of Another Victim of the State and the Un-Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Gets A Shiny Badge of Dishonor.

 

1 December 2022 | Imran Siddiqui | Justice News | Washington D.C.

 

A Fallacy - can be described as - “A failure in reasoning which renders an argument invalid” - It can further be said that - “A logical fallacy is any kind of error in reasoning that renders an argument invalid. They can involve distorting or manipulating facts, drawing false conclusions, or distracting you from the issue at hand”.

​

Guilty by Association, in an Inductive Fallacy - An example of inductive reasoning is surveying 1,000 people about their favorite type of drink and extrapolating their answers to speak for the whole population. Related to this, an inductive fallacy happens when comparing the part to the whole is inaccurate.

 

It can also be determined that - “A fallacy of defective induction is a conclusion that has been made on the basis of weak premises or one which is not justified by sufficient or unbiased evidence.

 

So when the United States government convicts a citizen on the basis of a proven fallacy and then goes out of its way to change alibi witness testimony, you must know something is terribly wrong, especially when that person has already spent 20 years of his life because they convicted him on a known, unproven, false, fallacy - Guilt by Association - and on the basis of two eyewitness testimony 18 months after the crime occurred, only because the witnesses pointed Craig Saunders out of a photo lineup.

​

Continue reading on the jBlog -

https://www.justicenews.net/post/craig-saunders-unshackled-7-guilty-by-association-because-most-people-will-believe-all-the-lies